I'm particularly against agendas of this sort which focus on promoting tax evasion, anarchy, or other anti-government activities.
I'm against pro-government activities particularly starting wars, drug prohibition, counterfeiting and other violent acts against otherwise peaceful people. Guess we are diametrically opposed.
Surely you can oppose those things without trying to force it on everyone using Bitcoin?
If you like what he's contributed to Bitcoin so far and agree with his vision for Bitcoin "as a legal and widely utilized, decentralized replacement for fiat currencies",
Being for government, but against the things I describe is like being for the mafia but against all those things the mafia is generally associated with.
You can't change the nature of govt any more than you could go into the mafia and change it's nature. Government is just a label. It was established as the protection racket and that's the way it's always operated.
Your point about bitcoin being seperate from this is only valid if you don't see it as a replacement for fiat currencies. If you do, then there is inevitably the political side to think of.