Apart from the fact no one has to justify their actions on this forum, (much less give a time-frame for anything they intend to do) I have previously stated that anyone making connections should also mark the trust wall of the UID concerned - that way should you ever level up on the DT list your previous
Red Paint TM will become more noticeable.
I've also stated that it helps others who come after you to read on a suspects trust wall that a connection has previously been made; it can save hours of research to come to the same conclusion with the same evidence.
For big cases of abuse like this one, it would really help if you neg. rated all of them with a nicely written message in the following format:
"Accounts connected: username (uuid = ), username2 (uuid2 = )...".
That would make it much more easier and likely for me to catch up and neg. rate them soon. Writing these long negatives is really painful when you have to write them for hundreds of users.
What Lauda is referring to here is
on the Trust Wall, when you give a UID negative trust, (ie
Red Paint TM) ensure you add the actual UID number, it helps others later on to find the exact alt (in case you were to inadvertently copy the UID name incorrectly)
An example:
Silvercell
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=989547This is the accepted standard for posting in the thread since day one:
Accounts Connected: Frenk Best,
QX_Mix,
ALTIEX,
GRAN EX,
AtomION,
QSiontex,
Gloobal,
AMATEX,
InVizibl,
_|_Relax_|_,
CoSSmoS,
TrablBit,
StaaartUP,
BeautifuLL,
RespekT,
CREATIVE_Life,
BitcoinStaaar,
FloriDAbitco,
Sofiaaa,
BVG,
CIVIL_GAMES,
AntiMult,
-ProFit-,
DEEEVGeLes Apart from everything else, I don't have to then strip any UID numbers out when copying to the
Google Spread Sheet.