This guy gets it.
One person leaving negative trust does not speak for the entire community, and as such others who disagree with a particular negative rating can counter said negative rating with a positive rating of their own. This is a basic feature of the trust system.
I would not find it unreasonable for someone to ask for help with a problem, especially when the person being asked is sympathetic to their issue.
Perhaps Lauda's pill addiction makes it difficult to understand this.
Come on.. Everyone has different views and opinions.
Tagging users who may or may not be *abusing* the merit system isn't required now. Probably, we should let time pass through, let people get to use the merit system normally. And if they abuse, then corrective action shall be taken. Theymos is probably right on his behalf, as not all cases of sending and receiving merits may be abusal, this may further infuriate users and kind of scare them of not using their merits at all.
And please take your ridiculously ridiculous dispute somewhere else.
They do everything that would a person who received a red trust for no reason, could not return it. If you put a red trust, then you:
1. Do not have to write to the person who put it to you.
2. Do not ask to return the trust.
That's their whole policy! They do not care at all. They do not want to understand
I understand that it is hard to take such ratings for something that is not exactly your fault. You admitted your mistake, and due to various reasons, actmyname rechecked his ratings and he removed yours. Now enjoy and remember not to nag anyone via pms.
In our locale is already written, especially people with accounts, a legend and heroes.