Re: [ANN] MOBILEGO Crowdfund [$53 Million] - Decentralized Mobile Gaming Solutions
So what is my relation to the project? IMO a perfect ICO is an ICO that delivers on the dates it has set forth, time to start it and allow people to deposit and the time from it being closed to having the tokens being sent out.. You do realize that when you buy in to any ICO you basically buy shares, and get tokens/coins whatever they offer. AFAIK MGO never promised anyone any crazy returns over the short term.
Is this the first ICO you have been a part of? Let me tell you about the story of Antshares (Now NEO) and how their ICO went.. They barely had any english communication while offering their ICO to us in the west world, they had a bunch of issues during the time of raising the funds and some weird transactions that went unexplained. Once they launched their wallet so that people could start collecting their coins it was extremely broken and barely anyone could get it to work.. This went on for a few months (yes, months) and there were numerous of instances of people investing tens of bitcoins couldn't even claim their coins.
Where are they now? Do you think I regret going through the rough looking at how it all turned out? I have about 237x more confidence in Jack and the MGO team so yeah..
Perfection is subjective, you can't tell me that I'm wrong if I believe this ICO went smooth and was indeed perfect.
Lol I hate to poke the bear... or possibly salmon in this case, but iirc I called out the ICO having issues that were just ridiculous relative to many other successful ICOs, and you shilled back then too and conveniently forgot saying how the ICO had 0 issues or that all ICO's have issues. Something to that effect.
You let your post count get to your head, because you likely have longer time in crypto but clearly less knowledge about the market than, say I do.
Smooth is objective unfortunately...when other comparable ICO's had none of the issues all the 'trolls' are complaining about. If, in your opinion (which I'm starting to think is worthless from your new responses), you think an ICO should deliver on dates etc, then you're already making yourself look stupid because they had various issues notwithstanding angering people with extensions. But how about the roadmap that people keep citing to no avail?
It seems as though people stay quiet when incredibly logical and valid points and concerns are being presented, and then they wait for the dumb angry poster and jump in to defend the project.
And you wonder why people are calling you shills saying you must work for the project?... Could it be, if you were to re-read your posts you would see you seem to conveniently ignore any relevant points?...
Your veil is incredibly thick.
I'm incredibly busy as of late but I can't wait to see what pseudo-intelligent post I get back from this!!!!
Or maybe this is too logical for you and you'll just ignore it like everything else
