my first thought: good, an interview with michael stollaire. then I listened to a few minutes of the interview and read through the comments. Most give back what I thought: what a bad sound. I really did not understand a lot and then it was too exhausting for me to listen to everything. It may be that I missed a lot of information, but the sound makes it impossible for me to listen any longer.
I read in the comments that the two guys are friends and supporters of him. that explains why he gives an interview to a youtube channel with 4500 subscribers (a very long interview) Of course it's good to promote his project in many ways, but that seems to have been more of help to them both than titanium helped himself. I think that an interview with this sound quality should not be published on the official pages of Titanium, the project is too professionally raised and the interview unfortunately not.
Do not get me wrong, I think it's good that Larry and Joe are so enthusiastic, but maybe they should invest a few dollars in the equipment
You seriously listened to this? The sound is so bad, even though I tried listening. I just could not focus. Too bad so much energy wasted on something that could have been really good
I tried following the entire interview but couldn't, so i scrolled through until I found interesting segments.
A few tips I have for the guys who ran the interview:
- Record the interviewee digitally, instead of recording his voice from a speaker.
Then use headsets to listen to the interviewee and when you do the video editing just add another audio level to overlay the interviewee's recording
Just watch an episode of Joe Rogan
- I found it hard to follow, not only because of poor audio quality but also because there is too much dwelling on (deviating from the subject), it helps to close subjects by making firm & clear conclusions then to move on the next subject
- It's a better sight for the viewer to perform the interview on a desk, rather a couch and living table
All in all I think the questions are answered nicely but the execution is poor, there is potential