If there's going to be controversy, I might as well get the ball rolling.  

I remain wholly unconvinced that the Bitcoin Cash fork (and the original SegWit2x planned but unactivated fork) were hostile.  They still appear to me simply as different visions that were incompatible with the one the majority of Bitcoin users decided was best.  An innocuous difference of opinion, rather than a coup, but one that got out of hand and was taken to extremes on both sides.  And I'd agree that "Bitcoin is stronger than ever before", not because it vanquished a foe, but because each idea was able to take its own path and allow the market to decide.  I'm intrigued to see where both Lightning and 32mb blocks take their respective projects and how each will fare.  People here are generally too defensive of something that doesn't really need defending.  Bitcoin can take care of itself.  It doesn't need people to torpedo any ideas or projects that aren't compatible, it merely needs to allow them to leave and pursue those goals separately.  To the most resilient chain go the spoils.