As a matter of fact, any closed source project in the crypto ecosystem has an inherent flaw: it is not consensus based hence it is not protocol based while at the end all in all crypto technology is about protocols and consensus. I understand we have a lot of players in this ecosystem right now who play with their closed source services and softwares but the point is as the result of their heterogeneity and incompatibility they will be extincted, sooner or later.
So, by no means this proposal can be classified as an investment. Any investment by nature is long term and possesses a futuristic vision, closed source softwares have no future, imo.
So, by no means this proposal can be classified as an investment. Any investment by nature is long term and possesses a futuristic vision, closed source softwares have no future, imo.
Our project is closed for reasons of intellectual property. if we disclose it, everyone will be able to repeat it and then it will not be a unique phenomenon. And we do not agree that such projects have no future, there is no future for projects that projects only in words, imo. Yours faithfully , It-Group.
It is a multilayer wrong argument you have made:
First of all you are presenting your project in a well known bitcoin forum that and bitcoin is an open source protocol/consensus based technology. You will not find enough support here for your closed source mysterious algorithm and software, please understand it.
As of your greedy statements about 'intellectual property' it is worth mentioning that open source is not about violating such rights it is about the way you use them. A short term capitalistic vision leads to where you are but a more sophisticated and realistic vision leads to where Satoshi is. I'm not here to argue with you about this, instead I'm just trying to say one simple fact: Here is Satoshi's territory!
