There is no debate! He already clearly told you what you think you're reading is not the case! Troll.
Yes, yes there is. The debate is on whether it was fair to award the purchasers who made purchases @ the lowest prices instead of award the purchasers who purchased at the highest prices. It was handled completely backwards... Those who purchased @ 2 btc were NOT rewarded but those who purchased for 1 or less btc were? In what twisted version of history is that even logical?
Now, why don't you address that? Because there is no way to address that issue LOGICALLY and THAT is why nobody wants to have the discussion.
"In what twisted version of history is that even logical?" perhaps the logic is based on difficulty increase and not purchase price? One could argue that those who paid the highest price had the longest time mining at lower difficulty? Just a thought.