How we suppose to take KYC.legal serious if you change ICO rules while is in progress.

1 Would you change rules in our favor if ETH would increase instead?
   Show me legitimate ICO which did the same as you.
 
2 You manipulate hard cap as it suits you, and extending as it suits you. By doing it you diluting token, and screwing people who invested in you. Also, it creates distrust in your future actions

3 Most of your team members even doesn't list KYC.legal as their current occupation. And sometimes they are just freelancers with a few contacts. The team is suboptimal, without any experience in KYC industry.

4 You want to deal with KYC, and at the same time your company is based at Seychelles, all you eventually customers are not protected by any trusted legal framework.

All ICOs ratings can be easily manipulated, and currently, for me, there are so many red flags that I consider this project as the potential scam.