What do you call a person that is the opposite of being an independent thought-leader? A dependent thought-follower?
What do you call a dependent thought-follower that also happens to be a total yes-man to Reggie? A Reggie's bitch?
I have substantial VERI. Despite that, I am not Reggie's bitch. I am an independent thought-leader.
Because of that, I am being opposed by several bitches here on whatever I say, regardless of right or wrong.
If I say 1 + 1 = 11, these bitches will say I am spreading FUD, a troll, a paid shill, etc.
If I say 1 + 1 = 2, these same bitches will still say the same thing about me (spreading FUD, troll, paid shill, etc).
Nevertheless, I am proud being an independent thought-leader, regardless of shitty circumstances.
What do you call a dependent thought-follower that also happens to be a total yes-man to Reggie? A Reggie's bitch?
I have substantial VERI. Despite that, I am not Reggie's bitch. I am an independent thought-leader.
Because of that, I am being opposed by several bitches here on whatever I say, regardless of right or wrong.
If I say 1 + 1 = 11, these bitches will say I am spreading FUD, a troll, a paid shill, etc.
If I say 1 + 1 = 2, these same bitches will still say the same thing about me (spreading FUD, troll, paid shill, etc).
Nevertheless, I am proud being an independent thought-leader, regardless of shitty circumstances.
A self-appointed 'thought leader' who stir the proverbial - a perfect fit for a mutual admiration society consisting of one. This is unlike those who give valid criticism when it is due and valid support when it is due. Yet, the 'thought leader' fails to differentiate between the two.
