Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
crypt0velli
on 09/02/2018, 19:48:27 UTC
For XVG I was on zpool for 12 hours with zero rejected shares, but they take too much and my wallet for whatever reason is set to mine all blake2s instead of just verge then autoexchange.  Unimining = 10%+ rejected shares.  Antminepool I've only had one rejected share so far, but hasn't been running long.  Going to run for 12 hours and see the difference in currency between the two.

I have observed the same.  I am more 15+ hrs with 18.5 GH/s on zpool and only got 40% of what whattomine is reporting for the hashrate.  I am not sure about accuracy of whattomine on xvg-blake2s either but judging by other coins they have listed with reasonable estimate accuracy I would be suspicious on zpool.

Looking at other's response it seems,
zpool - less connectivity issues but lower payout.  
Unimining - connectivity issues mainly cause of surge in mining.
Antminepool - less connectivity issue.  payout is slow because it's much smaller mining pool.



Here is my report after mining XVG for over 25 hours straight on zpool with no more than 5 Rejected shares.

I have got roughly 2/3 of what whattomine says I should be getting.  That's quite the cut zpool is taking!


There was one point yesterday on Zpool I noticed the "total earned" report a number, but about one hour or so later, that number was reporting about 2 or 3 XVG less than the hour earlier.   That was a red flag WTF moment for me.

... Also I seem to be mining Ninja and Verge for some reason and can't figure out why.     Between that and the payout fishyness, I'm going to try another pool when I have the energy to make the changes to my .bat files.


I sincerely hope that a fair and properly functioning pool for XVG comes about for us, sooner than later.



Dependin how much hash you have 25 hours might not be a big enough sample to gauge accurately but seems to line up with the zpool narrative regardless..