PPT watcher here, I come in peace.
I have been reading the carnage from the previous pages, I can see both sides of the arguments.
Just to clarify, the following supposition from Rob Roche on Steem is FUD ?
https://steemit.com/populous/@rob.roche/populous-fraud-the-habitual-lying-of-ppt-ceo-and-convicted-fraudster-steve-n-ico-williamsExample scenario - not PPT.
Hypothetically and only hypothetically you see why an individual (in this example any individual) being convicted for 4 years for 'Obtaining money transfer by deception' is a problem when you are running a $1bn USD company that's single purpose of existence is money transfers.
And the other problem is that this situation would not be workable if the company was liable to follow 'fit-and-proper' persons law under U.K financial services regulations which is where PPT is registered. You need to consider if such a discovery was made at a company which was under such regulations.
If the steem post is FUD then such example scenarios are not even a consideration and PPT can continue on its way to becoming a multi-billion $$$ company and good luck to the PPT team as Crypto needs a success story.
Oi cockbag, As far as I am aware the only things that can stop you being a company director are being personally bankrupt or being banned by the courts from being a director.