Josh, would you be so kind as to state which, what and when the screen was passed by the FCC? Us monumental assholes ain't got a clue as to how the FCC site works and desperately need your expertise in helping us find the info.
As soon as you show us, I will send that $200 I owe you/BFL, and you can use if for whatevery you want. It doesn't have to go to any charity. You, Sonny, and your wifes/lady friends can go to a fancy restaurant and enjoy a fine meal using the funds. No problem here, bud.
All you have to do is show us monumental assholes where to look, and your golden, and we're square.
I'll also take a week off and not state one iota negative comment about you, Sonny, BFL, et al. I promise... I mean Honest Abe.
Bruno Kucinskas
406 W. Center St.
Sandwich, IL 60548
815-508-1668
Surrrre you will. Just like you lied last time about sending $200 to charity? You are a habitual liar, Bruno. You are a thief. You are an embezzler. You have no redeeming quality...
But lets see you hang yourself this time, here you go:
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=132722&fcc_id='MSQME370T'
It is clearly obvious that I did indeed inquire about a screen. But I honestly mistaken that screen as some component of the MR and not a peripheral device, in this case turning out to be the obsolete forerunner of the Nexus 7, of which Josh was so kindly provided the FCC link to.
I am now having this stuck up my ass because of the way I asked a question, a question I, among others, have asked easily a hundred times, all of which Josh and BFL have ignored.
This motherfuckin' cocksucker is now trying to turn the tables on me, and question my integrity. This I will not stand for!
and that you're a liar and a thief. This was established a long time ago. We are just confirming it again and again, every time you post.