its really not a professional way to introduce your ICO ..
ICO approach shows that the company expect that the community will not deliver the value to desirable level. but if you have a solid project - you don't need an ICO. so this is exactly what you can expect)
"The community will not deliver the value to the desirable level" I'm not sure I understand this.
And you're suggesting that if a company is successful it does not need an ICO? So where does it raise its funds? From VCs?
VCs are notorious for massively diluting control and causing all sorts of issues with fund-raising. ICOs are democratizing funding and taking control away from the VCs. I think you are missing the point of a legitimate ICO.