Quote from: lotfiuser on February 14, 2018, 05:58:38 AM

i dont believe in this satochi nakamoto story but what the profit of adding another rank ? i think its uselless i think they should change merit setting example for hero you need 250 merit 500 activity that would be a lot eazier to achieve than 500 merit ( you wont get merit anyway)

First of all, Satoshi, not Satochi. Even newbies should know how to spell Bitcoin creators' name.
Explain my, why theymos should lower requirements for certain ranks? High ranks like Hero or Legendary aren't supposed to be easy achievable, you have to deserve it. We already have enough users who reached high ranks before introducing merit system by making low quality posts.
If you aren't getting any Merit, that's your problem and it means that you are doing something wrong.

I would like to see new high rank added. Now there are so many Legendary members on Bitcointalk that this rank aren't exclusive anymore. And there are some users who are contributing here for long and maybe they deserved to reach special rank.
But no, not Satoshi. First of all, because only one person can be called Satoshi. Secondly, because this name aren't related to current ranks in any way. Maybe we could call them "Extraordinary" or sth similar?