great idea - much better than what we have now.. so when are you rolling it out?
Until such time, there is this simple workaround[1]:
~HostFat
gmaxwell
~OgNasty
qwk
Vod
~Tomatocage
DiamondCardz
KWH
ibminer
~defcon23
Mitchell
~cyclops
Blazed
hilariousandco
~shorena
~jonald_fyookball
~CryptoImperator
~chronicsky
~Quickseller
Zepher
actmyname
The Pharmacist
Lutpin
Gunthar
This puts OP at a well deserved rating of -4078.
Keep the system we currently have. 99% of people who get tagged with negative feedback deserve it, but of course when it happens to them they kick up a fuss about. I'm all for people disputing any feedback received but anybody who was abusing it would likely be removed from DT pretty fast but this rarely happens.
At least a few DT seats would have to be changed for this to work. As for that type of case, I don't remember a single one in quite some time.
Anyone can do a few trades or make themselves out to be trustworthy and that's what QS was doing. It wouldn't surprise me if he was just here for the long con from the start but I certainly don't trust him because of his behaviour and due to how he's conducted himself since his fall from grace (which was entirely his own fault due to his fragile ego and pathetic grudges). His level of butthurt borders on mental illness and it's clear he won't stop until he feels like he gets his revenge and comeuppance and this thread is further proof of it.
Unless he is permanently banned, he will not stop. Although, it's quite petty that he believes this changes anything at all for me. This affects
everyone else. But hey, if you like scams then I guess that's a win.
[1] My recommendation. Most people who should look better, look better. Most people who shouldn't, don't.