now some newsletter guy is the argument why this coin is legit and recordbreaking, hmmm

you know how  this kind of newsletters work?

they recommend something, doesnt matter if it is a crypto or stocks or whatever, and before doing so, they are in, big, at low prices.
due to their subscribers and the rumor spread, ppl buy. result : the chart raises (logically). they can claim "my recommendation was good, it raised loads after i did" but this is happening BECAUSE of this rec and not because of the proof of quality.

i can only encourage anyone to trade/buy/sell based on own analysis and thoughts. newsletter or youtuber or whatever guys who recommend, should be watched and not forgotten, but look at this kind of informations carefully, always.


if i had 100k subscribers and i would recommend ANY random coin with some arguments, ppl would buy and it would raise, just by logics.

the fact that ronnie recommended uny in the past proofs this big time. it raised due to this, but dropped loads after, because it was a bullshit coin.

i still dont see anything behind it, and those things backed by arguments should make alarmbells ring. the things promised for uny are WAY to good (why would they back a token worth 0,002 in the start with 1 dollar each? it makes no sense. they  could have easier created a complete NEW one, instead of using an old token, that already was used for p 'n d / scam.