QS has probably been badgering the people who have just excluded Lauda for quite some time until they acquiesced to his demands.
You lose pretty much all of your credibility when you start making things up that have no basis in truth.
I don't suppose you have any evidence and/or information to back this up, do you?
I'm all for people disputing any feedback received
If you are someone who supports the ability to dispute trust received, I would suggest you review
this quote from Lauda.
I would also ask a similar question that I asked salty, do you have any examples of Lauda engaging in a serious public discussion about his sent ratings? I know that I do not have any such examples. I do have a lot of examples in which lauda has responded to disputes about his ratings with cat memes. I also have 9 examples of Lauda leaving negative trust, in which his comment indicates it was for being critical of him after only reviewing the past month of his sent ratings.