I also reviewed Lauda's sent trust over the past month, and identified ratings against 9 members in which the comment on the rating indicates that it was given because they publicly criticized. This makes it clear to anyone who is scammed by lauda, including anyone who doesn't fully agree with the outcome of a trade that they cannot voice their criticisms. It also makes it clear to anyone that disagrees with any of lauda's ratings that they should not speak publicly about this, removing any serious pressure for lauda to respond to any threads about his ratings with anything other than cat memes.
-snip-
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1717650I don't see any evidence of this being the result of community feedback, nor do I see any evidence of any public discussion about this person's ratings.
Re, this:
Have you seen any examples of Lauda changing his behavior in reaction to feedback from the community? I have no examples of this, nor do I have examples of Lauda removing a single rating in response to community feedback.
Of course it was due to feedback of others, otherwise it would never have gotten removed. There was feedback about it from day one. Public discussion was unnecessary. I can handle my own stuff, without you and your alts interfering.
Whats wrong with living in a shack? Some people choose to live within their means and if a shack is their only option than so be it
Nothing. However, there is something very wrong in trying to insinuate that I'm solely financially desperate when one lives in a shack. Someone who is solely financially motivated would never work for this system (i.e. either never want to be in DT or only work on their own profit while the community suffers; a perfect example or two can be found in here).
Being new here,
LOL. Since you very clearly intentionally are trying to create the false impression that you are new here, it is beyond even any
unreasonable doubts that you are new here
It's attempting to mock nullius, thus is very likely to be you rather than someone else.