The problem with you is that you can't even admit you're wrong when you are proven wrong. Your inflammatory comments were completely incorrect and out of line regarding the real nature of the true severity of the issue. Should the trademark be registered? Of course it should. It is catastrophic for the future of the company? Not one bit. Is VERI at risk to cybersquatters? Not at all, they can easily win a claim against a cybersquatter with or without the registration.
It's one thing to make a suggestion, it's quite another to start calling names and accusing incompetence when the reality as I have already clearly shown is that lack of trademark registration is no big deal and quite frankly, not even worth discussing.
Discussing reason and logic with you is utterly a total waste of time and effort.
I never say it is severe for not registering a trademark.
I say Reggie is very stupid for not registering a trademark, which is what he is supposed to do as a businessman.
You avoid answering me the questions:
Why give a leeway for anyone to cause any legal hassle/trouble by not registering your own trademark? Why avoid taking the advantages that naturally come with registering your trademark as soon as possible? If not registering a trademark is equally the same as registering it, then what advantages are you talking about?A simple research on Google on why registering a trademark is advantageous would answer it all, but you instead continue to beat around the bush.