A slight confusion, one of your goal is to reduce cost spent by both job seeker and hirer by acting as a bridge for both side. While this aim can be reached and actualized on the job seeker's side, doesn't the opposite effect happen to the job hirer side? To recruit employee, companies had allocated certain funds bestowed to HR department. Now, because they hire you as their bridge, they'll need a higher cost as they had to pay to use your service as well as still has to funds their HR dept.