Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread
...
eAsic's 28nm not very mature? Lol! eAsic has been working on 28nm at least since 2010. Also, Seagate just announced their investment with them on the 28nm tech, but of course, what would Seagate know, right?
eAsic's 28nm not very mature? Lol! eAsic has been working on 28nm at least since 2010. Also, Seagate just announced their investment with them on the 28nm tech, but of course, what would Seagate know, right?
I see the Seagate deal isn't hushed by a NDA, Y U think that is
Actually it looks to be able to the same,
We know Seagate is working with eASIC
We know ActM is working with eASIC
That's pretty much the extent of it, however ActM is not a large company and eASIC doesn't want to do a "press release" about working with them like they would with Seagate.
Also eASIC put out that press release so it would be up to eASIC to do that for ActM not Ken.
Not sure what you're driving at. eAsic announced in a press release that it got money from Seagate. Ken wants us to believe that he was "allowed to tell us" that he converted BTC to USD at the worst possible time, weeks after the fact. If that sounds plausible to you, Ken's *own finances* covered by NDA with eAsic, then Y U be hatin' on pones?
Edit: Why do you think eAsic made Ken sign such a sweeping NDA, and ... does he also have to put his hand in eAsic's back pocket, look pretty and keep his mouth shut?
