Shills, tone it down a little. You shills are going overdrive here pushing a narrative that is clearly full of flaws. It's funny how someone posted an audio interview here with Erik Voorhees talking about 'Arbiter' and claimed that it must mean he is owner of "artbitrade.com" - really?... Or how a single wallet with 9.4b tokens is explained away that the "wallet is clearly the boards which contains the coins to be burnt and the non circulating" - really? You figured all that out based on what?
If you want to shill successfully don't behave like a shill on steroids... Tone it down. Pretend to notice the obvious flaws and try a more plausible explanation.
Also, common sense states that unless there is a public face with a public name publicly claiming ownership of something then it is - by definition - a "fishy deal" a.k.a scam. So until there is a public name, with a face claiming UNY publicly then you have nothing to base your arguments on, just make-belief. Oh wait... You might have something to base your arguments on actually - the fact that you all shills are part of the scam and are frustrated that UNY can't seem to break and sustain the 1k satoshi limit... Do those of us who love trading a favor, let us know when the dump is about to occur so we can get out ahead of it