Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][FlexFee™][SegWit] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
by
JaredKaragen
on 18/02/2018, 15:46:38 UTC
What interval is everyone here using with ZPOOL & NEMOSMINER -- my mining profit seems unusually low recently -- using a 300-second interval at the moment.


On my ccminer x17 script i get 39 MH/s hashrate and on Zpool web page is 26 MH/s
Same with Tribus on ccminer is 250 MH/s but on zpool get a half of my speed .

Same for money, of course, Awesome Miner estimate between 14-25$ but get only 8$

Any ideea ?

Thank's!

PS. They have some kind of penalty if I change the script too often ?

Yeah, the real world poolside calcs can leave be much to be desired for accuracy.... this is why when I do normalizations (the benchmark), I use the poolside averages in my norms.

Tribus;  not sure;  post up the miner app you are using, as well as the card(s) you are using.  This info may help crackfoo see what is causing it.  Typically you can see up to %20 less hash, but on average somewhere around -5-8% of what the miner app is reporting.  50% is a huge difference, but if everyone is seeing the same -50%;  then its cancelling itself out and nobody has an advantage (I noticed he restarts some services/ports when this happens on some coins/algos).

See;  profitability will never match the miner's guess if it never sees the same number as the site calcs.  That is the biggest fault of the client-side profitability calculations.

If the site used the reported hashrate from the miner;  someone could just modify the miner app to feed the pool erroneous/false data and you'd get paid for doing nothing in a way....  so the closest solution is what we use, and its far from perfect, but quite logical and reliable.    I've also noticed when luck is down for me;  I typically see the same results in everyone else's shares as well (the pool graphs pane).  Since all users in the pool are going to be working from the same base blocksignature hash salt to find the next block;  they tend to work from the same grouping of potential winning salt/nonce combination, and in turn, the same sort of results.

With multiple machines on different accounts, I have noticed the same low days and same high profit days on each account within a small % of error.... this is why I feel that luck is all encompassing based on base root hash we are all working on successive chunks on.

recalcs/switches can be a nuisance if the API is not responding.  Longer delays are better;  because most pumping rises in coins tend to happen over the course of a few hours to half a day... so having the recalcs done with more of a delay, probably won't hurt you.