It's amazing that you still have postive trust from lauda
Care to explain? Have I done anything untrustworthy?
I see this thread is in support of lauda, if it wasn't you would probably be tagged for spreading lies
, does your sarcasm-shilling paid signature also help explain the concept of
satire?ELI5 time, for those who
justdontget it. I have just declared that
Lauda is the Bitcoin Forums Joan of Arc. Also, I am pointing out that the promulgation of baseless anti-Lauda megathreads and rapid-fire smears is an attempt by Quickseller to create the hysterical atmosphere of a
witchcraft trial. He has already
affirmatively declared that his so-called standard of evidence is the same as what is frequently published in the mainstream media (translation of Quicksellers mainstream media: scandal-sheet tabloids which carry news about Batboy).
(I have previously noted that
Quickseller is the Bitcoin Forums Iago. Here, I separately insinuate that he has delusional fantasies of being a Grand Inquisitor.)
Yes, I am aware that I am here looping together disparate historical events; and Jeanne dArc was burnt at the stake on politically motivated trumped-up charges of heresy, not witchcraft. However: (0) Nobody cares about history anyway. (1) Its called literary license. Apropos hereof, the political motivation was that England was butthurt by Joan whipping them bloody on the battlefield; sound familiar?
EditP.S., did you seriously think I might claim my behaviour to be controlled by a magical witchcraft spell? Have I hereto demonstrated any evidence of psychotic delusions?