Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: [List] Suspected users that are abusing merit 3.0
by
poGium
on 19/02/2018, 08:15:22 UTC
I'd love to be an alt of nullius.

Can you tell me exactly where I wrote that you are nullius alt account? That's the problem with this thread. It's not just about alt accounts that abuse the Merit system, but also accounts that abuse the Merit system, which are not alt accounts (between friends). And in my opinion, this is clearly happening. Friends who give other friends sMerits.


Well, Alia, were I your alt, then I’d be so much prettier.  Also, I would get paid to gratify myself.  Also, I would be able to gratify myself whilst receiving lessons from me in “the techy crypto stuff”.

By the way, congratulations on having invented Bitcoin!  (satoshi = nullius = alia_armelle)

And again. Where do I write something about alt account?

(For the record, I think that you have a grudge against Alia

I have no grudge against her or you. She has shown me in her thread what morality she has in terms of girlfriend and boyfriend. I can not respect people who cheat on their partners! In her thread she has written that cheating is only bad when the other person finds out.

Why thank you. I don't condone cheating, but what she doesn't know won't hurt her - pretend you're watching ordinary porn. I wouldn't mind if she joined in, either Wink


But let's get back to the merit system.

In this thread, the OP asks if it's okay to give a friend sMerits. The answers are clear, because it is said that you can give sMerits to a friend as long as the posts are high quality.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2835874.0

While we will not be directly moderating this, I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.

In addition, theymos writes that you should give sMerits to posts that have an objectively high quality and not on posts you agree with. So as I understand it, you should not see the merit system as a "Like" button, but distribute sMerits to posts that have a high quality.

*sigh*

There is no way to prove a negative.

And now we look at this post. Did you give a sMerit here because it shows a high quality or because you (as always, it is ONLY nullius) agree?


I am not obligated to justify my merit award judgments

What bothers me about the whole thing additionally is the double standard of some DTs. As I mentioned earlier, such a behavior is tolleriert, but on the other hand, other people are given a negative tag, because they get sMerits, which could have the same cause, as in this case.

So, on the face of the matter, we’re talking about a 19-year-old who has never tried drugs and is curious about them.  That’s it.  (How many 19-year-olds have never tried drugs, including marijuana?)

I never said that I find it reprehensible that she takes drugs. It's her decision, why should I care? I only mentioned it because she opened a thread to it.