@ cryptoyes Graft is still the most profitable coin in relation with ICO price. today is 4 time higher than 10 days ago.
what profitability? the coin doesn't exist on any exchange and you have no idea what actual value it will have when it hits exchanges.All you can say is that even now (higher diff), mining it using rented hashpower is FAR cheaper than the ICO price, and it was even cheaper mining it during the ICO. If you don't admit that the ICO was shady because of this, then you likely have hidden interests or could be a (potential) victim yourself. Nobody should have bought in this ICO. At best, they should have rented hashpower and mined it instead (and then pray they don't miss the dump of all miners selling when/if it hits exchanges).
You're a fan. I get it. Doesn't change the list of shady stuff I highlighted https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2115188.msg30565779#msg30565779 ... for example, can you name just 3 verifiable (and worthy) companies from the 140+40 they claim they partnered with?
We're all tired of scammers. If you want people to know about GRAFT, then tell them about the above as well.
p.s. What communication? The telegram chat is a ghost town as far as team members are concerned ... it's full of incredibly rude supporters and miners.
If anyone "official" from the GRAFT team can address some of these issues, that alone would set a lot of minds at ease. I would not dismiss @cryptoyes comments above and elsewhere in this thread as FUD without providing any "official" information, but I do fear that this is not going to happen. This teams continued silence is only going to kill this project before it's even started and it will only fuel the fear mongers that GRAFT was indeed a scam.
Prove them wrong GRAFT team by speaking up - your continued silence will also tell the forum readers of your true intentions.
-N