"I'm not one bit interested in balance, what we need is productivity, only that gets Gulden to the next level. If this happens in a critical or euphoric way doesn't interest me at all. This slack is not something any user is entitled to, everybody is merely a guest here. We (Admins and I) decide what happens here, if we don't like something, we act upon it. It has nothing to do with democracy, no one has to be here."
I guess this says enough
I guess this says enough
I have always been against centralized coins, but then I held and still hold Litecoin, which was for a very long time led and determined by one man. He is still at the top today but has already let go of all his coins, so in a way, he already started his distance from it and has said he would stay only until the old ATH is reached.
My point is, it is okay for a coin to be led by one guy, if the community is okay with it. Is this community okay with that?
The Russians were okay with Stalin or Apple was ok with Steve Jobs. Which one is Rijk?
An insult to both Stalin and Jobs?