Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: TheButterZone trust abuse and hostile auction conditions
by
TheButterZone
on 20/02/2018, 20:28:45 UTC
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2661682.0

He lists the starting amount as $60,000 USD.  I bid it.  He negs me. 

This guy just gets to ruin my account because he's on some power trip?

The proper way to deal with a DT member is the same as every member; don't violate their binding terms & hope the mob will get you out of the terms you agreed to in advance.

The term you violated in my OP is also quoted & specified in my rating. Kindly drop the false pretense that you're illiterate/dyslexic & should be allowed to sabotage my auctions with impunity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd9muK2M36c

This:

Proof of funds can be given to trusted escrow. 

violated this:

Auction Terms (should go without saying, but: if violated, negative feedback with risked BTC will be left)
...
  • No terms or conditions (including by any other name) may be proposed or demanded (including by any other name) by any bidder.



As Self-EscrowGate proved anyone can get away with a criminally-indictable offense more severe than simply being a ham sandwich & not even at a bare minimum get permabanned from BCT...

I've noticed "self-escrowing" & escrows not keeping up/being able to keep up with their deals. I've noticed an escrow telling the victim terms for release, then when met, going back on them & not releasing, leaving it up to the perpetrator to authorize release.
If "I" ever accept or offer escrow services, assume my account is compromised.



philipma1957, I approve of ~TheButterZone being added to your https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
That is not necessary. Undecided

The trust system is more of a liability or neutrality than an asset to me.

Liabilities:
Takes up too much of my time dealing with complaints about my level, contracts enforcement
Place for people to libel me in retaliation for citing their own words
People "buying ratings" and wanting me to give them a positive rather than a neutral, based on them having no others or what seem to be weighty negatives (and people wanting my positives to be removed based on subsequent allegations)

Neutrality:
Those who act like they want to trade significant amounts P2P/OTC ignore my ratings and/or won't cryptographically verify it's actually me who earned them

Asset:
?

If it will stop all this BS, again I say: I have no attachment to being on DT.



The fact that he's blocked PMs and makes you go to his own site to contact him is a bit weird too.

That was because of this forum bug I'd reported earlier, which later seemed to have been silently patched. As soon as I noticed it had, I reverted to specific blocks of time-wasters, from block all.