It is provably fair,
How could you say it is provably fair if there is no ways to verify the draw, you will use random.org only with a live streaming draw. That's not a provably fair system as long as I understand. Why? Live streaming can be faked as well as the draw by random.org
Come on, offering such big prize with not cheap ticket should have a better process on the drawing.
We are going to let a third party do the draw. We are planning to get the people from random.org themselves (if possible, or someone well known) to do the draw, but we will not do the draw ourselves. Would you rather have the people who made the raffle come up with a process to draw (more chances of manipulating the draw) instead of a completely unrelated third party (that is also well established)? Do you think random.org is not fair in choosing its random numbers? If you have concerns about how random.org chooses random numbers, check out their FAQ page as they have tons of information. Thanks.
Regards,
CryptoEbeFor a big jackpot like this then using random.org isn't really not good at all or more appealing from a potential player.Even though you will say about manipulative draw which is really possible maybe choose another way on drawing out like live draws but well it doesn't matter at all because you wont really hit up that ticket sales for sure.Its too big to accumulate such thing and its not really convincing about into its terms.
I think we should not argue further about it, I realize that it is useless for us to suggest them to make their site looks better. They thinks that they have the best system already, they do not want to hear any feedback from the community and will just stay at what they have planned.
I'm out, and good luck for the site owner to find real buyers and good luck for the real buyers if they trust this site.