Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: Is Gulden a good investment?
by
metare
on 21/02/2018, 16:46:37 UTC
So, testing for a few months now... and now they come with "It is extremely complex and must be perfect"?

Seems like they found fundamental, exploitable flaws in their idea.

Can you imagine with a deadline they are unable to deliver something... now without deadline ,what it will be ...

And with their fantastic communication now  everybody know when it will be ready : It will be ready when it will be

G is dying and will be soon a zombie coin

Everytime I see posts like this, I immediately assume no basic knowledge about software development of the issuer of the post. I always wonder why such a person would put a serious amount of money in cryptos, knowing that the market is flooded with scamcoins.
Delay in software release is already an old topic and well known but "There is no silver bullet!", especially not in big releases.
Yes you are right I have no basic knowledge in software development. So I suppose if you want buy stock of a biochemical company , you should at least have Biochemical Phd ? No you read the investor fact sheet , and decide what to do. In this case the fact sheet is the official website where announcement is done. But following your opinion , Dev are liars and we can not trust him. Good to Know.

If you want to invest in a startup with new biochemical stuff in the pipeline, then you don't need a Phd but you should be able to understand if their claims are rubbish or not. Especially for startups you can't rely on how they performed so far. Also you should be able to know your risk, which safes you from surprises. If you can't do this either the company is not transparent enough or you didn't do enough own research.. or both.
I don't see evidence that they are liars, nor is this my opinion. Since I know about the difficulties to estimate time consumption of a software project I never saw those dates in the roadmap as a promise but as a self set goal of the developers.