So in short you are investing in Ronnie Moas. That is fine, it's one way to do it (although I strongly disagree with). I do listen to all opinions and views including in forums like this BUT finally make a decision on my own. One key point I pay attention to is the actual team working on a given project. Who they are, what they've done before, what they have to lose if the project tanks etc etc. So far, no one knows (factually speaking) who is really part of or behind cryptobontix team - why? Because as of now they do not want to be known. That is a huge red flag irrespective of ones bias given that their projects are neithe decentralized nor open source and thus can't be independently scrutinized / verified.

We can talk UNY/DIG volumes all day long but fact of the matter is, any average person can issue an ethereum token within hours if not minutes and therefore talk on volume / amount, this billion, that billion don't really matter because again - anyone can create and issue a token within a short period. Whitepapers used to mean something a few years back but not anymore either - why? Because anyone can get a whitepaper written within days or even plagiarize an existing one (we've seen this happen before). What this means is, you can really only sensibly bet on the team behind a project. It is therefore surprising  to skeptics like myself how you could conclude that it is something to HODL when we don't even know who is behind the project.

On the 400-600% short term gains - I agree that it is a good way to trade especially when you are skeptical of a project.