He guys, at the crowdcoin forum i read this quote ? from GreenPanda,
_______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________
Let me first say that this is just my own opinion, not the one of others. I am not trying to spread fud, I am just one miner, do what you want with my message... but here is a copy/paste of a post that I made on the Sparks coin thread a few days ago... My suspicions are getting more serious since, those always anonymous developpers are getting more and more silent, and I feel it is important you research this:
Sparks, Rapture, Phobos, Cerberus, Crowdcoin, Race, Dinero, Infinex, Force, Stipend, Endorphin, VIVO, Innova, Cropcoin and the list goes on and on and on.... All the same exact pattern copied: Masternode/PoW hybrid, ''small'' premine, Masternode auctions through discords, Airdrops , Anonymous teams, same wallet code and bugs, Masternode gets most or half of the mining, only on stocksexchange (except 2 or 3 of thoses)... It wouldnt surprise me if it would be all coming from the same team/person or maybe a teacher somewhere giving his students a school project to each start a coin... Extremely suspicious, do your research and prove me wrong please!
_______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________
I dont hope its tru, i just invest in some masternode of this list pffffff
I can only speak for our own project and say that there's no connection between our team and any of these other projects, Rapture is our team's sole focus and we wouldn't even have the bandwidth to attend to another project! It's not uncommon for projects to have extensive similarities in code....many projects fork from Dash because their feature set is mature and is an excellent starting point, so there are going to be a lot of similarities in the code base, particularly early on. Dash, like many projects, is forked from Bitcoin core, so there are going to be even broader similarities there. PivX, which is considered a strong project, forked from Dash a few years back and there was a time that they would have been considered similar to other projects....but they've built from that point forward and evolved into a very separate project with its own unique features.
I believe one of the main factors worth considering when doing your research is what the team is putting into the project in terms of commitment (hopefully evident by how they engage with the community), what their vision and roadmap is for their project and whether or not they have a unique or real-world application (in our case a few of our early differences are charity nodes and a strong charity focus overall, physical gifting cards, and a few other strong unique ideas in the works). Thanks!