Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency
Alt36 - Ken Ramirez (Dash budget proposal owner) on The Crypto Show
https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/the-crypto-show-ken-ramirez-of-alt36-a-pos-for-the-cannabis-industry
https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/the-crypto-show-ken-ramirez-of-alt36-a-pos-for-the-cannabis-industry
Quote
Alt36 about their new product that will bring a General Bytes ATM and point of sale for Dash in to Cannabis dispensaries. Dispensaries have a serious problem of less than desirable access to traditional banking. Dash and Alt36 aim to solve that problem with digital currency.
Ken Ramirez if you're reading this...and I hope you are...you gotta be smart here. You need to stop making public statements. You need to stop agreeing to speak to the media. (Although it's a bit late for both of these things) You need to get a lawyer that understands federal cannabis laws, money transmission, and cases involving technology.
I'm not sure you're ready for the truth, but here's the truth...and it sucks:
Marijuana is legal in California, but it's still illegal under federal law, so you can get charged with a federal crime for using marijuana even in a state where it's legal.
You're going to spend about 6 months - 18 months in a federal prison. Go download the Federal Sentencing Guidelines manual and look up the guidelines under the sections for financial and drug crimes. Then look at the table. (Yes, judges can depart from the guidelines...but they rarely do.) 90%+ of federal cases wind up with the accused going to jail. This is the federal system. Not many people just get probation in the federal system.
Who cares about this loser anyway. It's had no effect on our growth and adoption and frankly pretty pathetic. We'll keep him in our sand box. Certainly it's now proven he's invested in DASH...and couple of us are zeroing in on where he is... 
It's also come to my attention that he is also a Masternode owner. This is revealing... There is a connection here that. We are trying to get to the bottom of... And we'll keep digging.
Remember Icey... Money can buy information and the corrupt can be bought!
It's also come to my attention that he is also a Masternode owner. This is revealing... There is a connection here that. We are trying to get to the bottom of... And we'll keep digging.
Remember Icey... Money can buy information and the corrupt can be bought!
What does this mean? First you say "who cares about this loser" and then brag about how you are stalking and doxing me? That doesn't make sense.
Please stay on topic, which is Dash, and stop breaking the forum rules (not to mention federal/state laws) against stalking and doxing (and buying private information from "the corrupt").
You obviously have a lot of big fat assets to lose should anything bad happen to me as a result of your "zeroing in" on my location. I don't want your HYIP Masternodes (too much liability for money laundering and unregistered money services) but will be coming for the Misconduct winery/vineyard/restaurant if you give me a good reason.
Quote from: http://www.forgetthebox.net/putting-doxers-in-the-dock-how-canadian-law-punishes-online-offenders-201610181/
Though Canada has no specific law criminalizing doxing, our existing laws fill this void just fine when you think about what the act entails.
People post home addresses, phone numbers, credit card information, and private email addresses with the intent that someone other than them will see it and steal, harass, and threaten death, rape, or worse.
Fortunately, in Canada we have section twenty two of the Criminal Code which says that anyone who counsels someone to commit an offense is considered party to said offense. That means that if you encourage someone to commit a crime, you are considered as guilty of the crime as the person who actually did it even if they did it in a way other than the one you recommended. That also means that you are subject to the exact same penalties.
Lets say you post a womans home address on social media and say that she should be raped. That night someone sees your post and goes and rapes her. If the rapist convinces the authorities that they got the idea from your social media feed, you might be charged with rape and face the same five or fourteen year prison sentence (depending on the degree of violence involved) as the rapist.
If you post a persons private email address and phone number and encourage your followers to make death threats, rape threats, or threats of bodily harm, and they do it, youll be looking at the same eighteen months to five years as the people making the threats.
In order to get the same penalty, the prosecution would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you actively and willfully sought to encourage people to commit the crime and that you knew or ought to have known that a crime was likely to be committed as a result of your encouragement.
People post home addresses, phone numbers, credit card information, and private email addresses with the intent that someone other than them will see it and steal, harass, and threaten death, rape, or worse.
Fortunately, in Canada we have section twenty two of the Criminal Code which says that anyone who counsels someone to commit an offense is considered party to said offense. That means that if you encourage someone to commit a crime, you are considered as guilty of the crime as the person who actually did it even if they did it in a way other than the one you recommended. That also means that you are subject to the exact same penalties.
Lets say you post a womans home address on social media and say that she should be raped. That night someone sees your post and goes and rapes her. If the rapist convinces the authorities that they got the idea from your social media feed, you might be charged with rape and face the same five or fourteen year prison sentence (depending on the degree of violence involved) as the rapist.
If you post a persons private email address and phone number and encourage your followers to make death threats, rape threats, or threats of bodily harm, and they do it, youll be looking at the same eighteen months to five years as the people making the threats.
In order to get the same penalty, the prosecution would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you actively and willfully sought to encourage people to commit the crime and that you knew or ought to have known that a crime was likely to be committed as a result of your encouragement.