Instead of all the bullshit and all the empty threats of "I have proof.. I swear". Why don't you just share the proof QS?
I feel sad for anyone that actually listens to you or think that your words hold any weight at all.
Your latest change (I believe today) to the title of the thread was to add the language "6 socks added Lauda to their list." Are you going to list out those "6 socks" and then state reasons why you believe them to be socks of Lauda? Lots of moving goal posts and revolving drama here, no? Can you explain why you believe such an approach is justified?
It should not be difficult to find evidence yourself though. Just pick one person who has added lauda to their trust list; there is a ~1 in 9 chance of it being a clearly purchased account, and from there it should not be difficult to find the rest.
You want people to believe you, but then we are supposed to do the work? In any kind of case that you are alleging wrong doing, you should at least, for starters, make sure that the allegation is clear, thereafter you would at least outline the facts and the logic that supports the allegation(s), no? Those burdens are on you. It should not be our obligation to go research the seeming vagueness that you are asserting, right?
It should not be difficult to find evidence yourself though. Just pick one person who has added lauda to their trust list; there is a ~1 in 9 chance of it being a clearly purchased account, and from there it should not be difficult to find the rest.
The burden of proof is on the accuser. You make a pretty shitty case if you can't provide such, and instead tell people to find it themselves.
At minimum particularize the allegation for us with sufficient facts and logic, in order that we could look to verify what is being alleged.