Exactly, but, ironically enough, the one who stole the land WAS the employer.
Isn't it magical how this all comes full circle?
How did the employer steal the land then? There is something you're not telling me.
You know the way macropolitics always works, economic destruction by officials,
land purchase by corporations, jobs worked by people who could have never had a practical opportunity to influence either decision.
So.... not theft then. OK.