Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: OFFICIAL LAUNCH: New Protocol Layer Starting From “The Exodus Address”
by
dacoinminster
on 06/09/2013, 15:49:03 UTC
I am checking one of the first tx to 1EXoDus address from:
https://blockchain.info/address/1PA8qhEzW7to6EeqBAdhVZYGbVj2MfmN2n
which was 16BTC and it happened 2687249 seconds (around 31.1 days) before 1.9.2013.
The bonus is then 10% for a week, which is 10%*2687249/(3600*24*7)=>44.43%
[this fits to 4 weeks = 40%]
or in dacoinminsters:
160000000000+71091243386=231091243386
which is:
2310.91243386 mastercoins

Can I ask you what time you are using to define the end date? I'm using 1377993600. I think this is the difference between our results.

minor remark: precision of 8 decimal, and not 13.

This should be fixed in the next release.

OK I did find one outstanding issue with mastercoin-explorer - it still counts the same address multiple times in one purchase. For instance, on this transaction:

http://blockchain.info/tx/52a875a46d7973760974b2ae8fa7bb71bfe7d06e0be8fd2bf2e20eaca182dbd7

When I enter the purchasing address (196V2uB471HoMHwbkQRQRiwd3aYpU6RtWg), I get "Bought 210000.0 Mastercoins and got a 88206.42361111111 Mastercoins extra."

The buyer sent 420 BTC with 5 inputs of 100 BTC each and 80 BTC change, which should have been 42000 MasterCoins plus a bonus. 42000*5 = 210000 which implies each input is being counted.

Probably related is the bug in the handling of this purchase: http://blockchain.info/tx/37992e445c33dd74a1e4e00dabb6a66f16a5d39977a1f5fd1a6c0154e884eee2

15XJoDF4xCUrWX3ES9ftWq3wnGhuRsqrLk (which had the largest total input) should be the owner of those MasterCoins rather than 1G6F8aMJNp3zMG9L1DxDT3WjiUntJYwYka (which had the largest single input). MasterCoin-Explorer incorrectly credits the latter address with the purchase. I realize I need to be more clear in the spec about how to do this!

I've fixed this individual issue. But I'm going to run through all the transaction this weekend to make sure I got all edge cases.

On the topic of which transactions to refund; I would vote that all transaction up to block #255362 get included. The last block in August (255361) was 23:47 which seems not fair to use. The next one is #255362 which was a few minutes after.


1G6zjkpKHaDETbswWCJwyu3PQMesoCHvvz - Wallet ID

fc60a1b4b2b267b78c006cdd2cecbb61b8c6a30f2e0af116aab9cb3ef8a94ae2-000  - 5 BTC

e66c3d9e1a9ce18f71ef81eb4fcbe83a23c86cb098f8c2cdcc40bf86b8f4b735-000   - .00729 BTC

The transaction lookup is only for real Mastercoin transactions; not transactions that are buying coins via Exodus.

Is there a mastercoin irc channel?
Curious about how this project will evolve btw.

Whenever I'm online I can be found at #mastercoin.

I'm cool with that. I'm guessing block 255362 transactions would get a bonus of zero? It's possible that if you just used the same math, they'd actually get a small negative bonus!

Assuming we accept investments through block 255362, here is my proposed refund list: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnnInaIJVqrtdGMteFNOWjBpWTNqd3BYbWUzdGVLMmc&usp=sharing

From that spreadsheet:

Quote
Refund Amount   Address
11   1KDCt8VoY45ya3QnExwtZEdugAnRAncr1Z   
27.5995   1Bqp4VEweM1S8FKGHWYviRRtSxv5tMAVih
10   1HMGFJLpVabBkPr7qqcMUXtwrTxfdYUgKL   
2.6   1FZh5jq1jiqUWSYrtPQhW3bUFCdDHU31WL   
0.1   1P1bvEdC5S8TsNsM7Nt43JiiX2YCpEhPnr   
0.11   1MVdiQSHvHhXzvMvEhEDtsPoBhdJ1zU8Ju   
0.32   1GaNupdUBzfVF2B3JUAY1rZwHoXJgjyzXj
0.01   1HpNa5GbsPRbJ1s931oNKGqgN5gVbBBE8s   
0.119   1QGrEUT3spsKDB6VPjrcfy21qx3f6CuCwF   
      
51.8585   Total Refund