As a forum user who has suffered significantly from the spam problem, I have left my own feedback for
#1183469 trugad. Note the long list of users who have submitted what on the face of things is farmed positive trust feedback. (I took a screenshot of the same list, although I have not yet uploaded it anywhere.)
Date: 2018-02-25
Reference:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180225005717/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3014024.0Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
#1183469 trugad (herein: the spammer) openly admits against interest to being a bounty campaign manager who paid for posts. That is: Admits to paying for spam. Posted a whine thread complaining about negative feedback from ibminer, administrator mprep declining to interfere with ibminers independent decisions, etc., ad nauseam. Then, admitted and averred to trust farming (how to earn a positive trust? I asked my clients to write me a positive opinion, but they do not count.). When aTriz called this out as trust farming, the spammer accusing aTriz of trust farming.
The spammer claims ignorance of the rule against paying for posts. That is: claims ignorance that spam is bad, *and* admits not reading stickied rules.
Spamming is *untrustworthy behaviour*. Whining about the consequences only adds insult to injury.
Note: In the time since ibminer left negative feedback on 2018-02-21, whereas the spammer admitted soliciting positive feedback, the spammer has received the following positive feedback. Most is generic and does not provide a reference link. **Some or all of these users *probably* left positive feedback due to positive feedback having been solicited from them:**
#1423659 George51rus
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1423659
2018-02-23: Meнeджep чтo нaдo, eгo бayнти вceгдa тoлкoвыe
Risked BTC: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
#1224024 ZhyravlikO
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1224024
2018-02-23: Responsible, decent, worthy of approval
Risked BTC: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
#896783 sensei stupid
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=896783
2018-02-23: he is a good people and im realy trust him. he so help full
Risked BTC: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
#1107542 veranika55
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1107542
2018-02-23: I think he's a very professional and experienced bounty Manager. I participated in a blogger's bounty and I think he is right and honest. And the fact that he likes order and forces to write reports, it is plus to his work as any bountist can prove on reports that he is right. When there is a report it is difficult for a person to make a claim that he did not do his job.
Risked BTC: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
#1411750 JohnPain
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1411750
2018-02-23: Good Bounty Manager, i trust him
Risked BTC: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
#1205302, bivins1
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1205302
2018-02-23: Have dealt with Trugad when they held their pre-sale for the MDL token . Sent me a wallet address and I got credited as discussed. I see him as very trustworthy person and i can vouch for him
Risked BTC: 2.00000000
Reference link: (none)
#1205302, bivins1 (again! with slight variation)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1205302
2018-02-23: Have dealt with Trugad when they held their pre-sale for the MDL token . Sent me a wallet address and i sent 2BTC and I got credited tokens as discussed. I see him as very trustworthy person and i can vouch for him
Risked BTC: 2.00000000
Reference link: (none)
#1421907 MDL Talent Hub
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1421907
2018-02-24: Trustful bounty manager
Risked BTC: 0.20000000
Reference link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2621659.940
#1707152 YaNinaMurmansk
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1707152
2018-02-24: I paid the bounty manager's work. Thank you, I advise everyone.
Risked BTC: 0.66000000
Reference link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2939690
**Prior to ibminers negative for spamming and the admitted subsequent solicitation of positives, the spammer only had a single feedback entry:** A positive, from a user also listed above:
#1224024 ZhyravlikO
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1224024
2018-01-26: Excellent bounty manager!
Risked BTC: 0.00000000
Reference link: (none)
This feedback is made consistently with my trust feedback policy:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3009256.0 Whines > /dev/null.
Edit, P.S.: In case that last line be ignored, I reserve the right to publicly post PMs, e-mails, etc. from spammers and/or spam supporters and/or spammer supporters.
Edit: Fixed two typographical errors. Also fixed in the trust feedback.