There were skeptics at 0.2, yes. Rightfully so, since AM hadn't proven itself yet - but it is my understanding that at that point it DID share more of its business plan with the public. 0.2 was a decent bet, considering there was not much competition on the scene, and lots of coins up for grab until the rest of the competition could mobilize.
This is NOT a comparable scenario, since AM is LESS transparent and headed for extreme competition.
It's hardly a fear campaign. If someone says "this is ridiculous!!! how could you sell, AM has the highest dividends!!" I'm going to point out why that's not really important.
I understand that you want to get more cheap shares. if not , what makes you spending your times day and day to explaining to everybody that AM will be dead?
And from my understand, the cost advantage in China will cover the technical disadvantage of AM. (If those west competitor could get win on Cost , there would not that much electric devices is made in China. )
If mining BTC is profitable , why FC didn't adding more hashrate? the only reason I believe is he is waiting for some better devices to get more profitable for himself.)
FC doesn't care about the Share price, Since He can't use this to measure his company's value in real world , I mean to get loan or other stuffs.
at 2.BTC per share , I think this would not be long , because once he announce his devices, folks will be shocked like the first time when he announced he invented USB miner.