If I may 
(sorry to the ignorers)
OK - now on to the personal attacks.
a little melodramatic don't you think?
Honestly, this should increase my credibility. I'm not a sockpuppet, or a burned business partner, or a major holder in the competition. I've actually got money on this, just like you do.
Increase credibility? It seems you are trying to manipulate the market by spamming made up bullshit
Don't be obtuse. The reaction of shareholders to the advertising space was the point - the investors are still euphoric about the most mundane things, and that demonstrates that there is quite a way left for AM to fall.
Euphoric? You dont even know if those posts are by shareholders, and in any case it does not demonstrate that there is quite a way left to fall
This is too vague for me to address properly. I wish you'd given examples or something. It honestly seems like you listed bad news in the parentheses, so...
If you can't respond to a general statement, ...
If things are going as well as you all think they are, I will lose my shirt if FC comes out with an update.
It is NOT unreasonable to expect this level of updates and feedback from a startup company. Do you have any idea the level of engagement that VC firms typically have with their client startups? Startups are VERY communicative. FC got his VC from the community, but lately he has gone dark.
Perhaps Bitfountain is the VC firm here, you are not. Comparing apples and oranges again
Wow, get fucked. I am now informed - I don't see how this is an issue. I know WHAT AM's products are, and being a little confused about the details of the transition from the old blades to the new blades does not really impact the big picture very much.
Would you ignore another user for this confusion? Ridiculous.
Because you have spent so much time claiming to be well informed, and hardware sales make up a large proportion of the business.
Guess it's gonna be kinda quiet in here for you, huh? A lot of people argue with me or ask me questions directly, and I take the time to answer them, which is why I sometimes constitute so many of the posts on a single page.
I'm not arguing with you, just pointing out flaws in your logic
"seed doubts on company's reliability"? Where have I questioned 'reliability', exactly? Nor have I run out of arguments, I assure you. Are any of them sensible?
Investors should be aware of the fundamental risks, but it is proven time and time again in this thread that many are not.
Perhaps they are aware of the risks, but make calculated decisions on their own, without your expert advice.
You are right that I can get defensive, which is a flaw and something I am aware of. However, I do not believe I ignore good counterarguments like you are insinuating. Mostly I feel like I can adequately defend my thesis from criticism.
If you have an actual disorder, then I apologise for my crack cocaine comment
Anyway, cheers, hope this thread improves for you without my posts.
(sorry to the ignorers)OK - now on to the personal attacks.
a little melodramatic don't you think?
- is short on AM
Honestly, this should increase my credibility. I'm not a sockpuppet, or a burned business partner, or a major holder in the competition. I've actually got money on this, just like you do.
Increase credibility? It seems you are trying to manipulate the market by spamming made up bullshit
- is concerned when AM buys advertising space 
Don't be obtuse. The reaction of shareholders to the advertising space was the point - the investors are still euphoric about the most mundane things, and that demonstrates that there is quite a way left for AM to fall.
Euphoric? You dont even know if those posts are by shareholders, and in any case it does not demonstrate that there is quite a way left to fall
- seems resistant to any positive news and instantly bad-mouthes them. (irrespictive of the fact that there were no negative news besides growing competition (=based on promises for unreleased products), low divs because of 2nd gen investment and partially low hashrate charts in the last weeks)
This is too vague for me to address properly. I wish you'd given examples or something. It honestly seems like you listed bad news in the parentheses, so...
If you can't respond to a general statement, ...
- has ridiculous demands for shareholders' comfort from a small startup company (that isn't even given by big companies in a regular market), just to ease his position 
If things are going as well as you all think they are, I will lose my shirt if FC comes out with an update.
It is NOT unreasonable to expect this level of updates and feedback from a startup company. Do you have any idea the level of engagement that VC firms typically have with their client startups? Startups are VERY communicative. FC got his VC from the community, but lately he has gone dark.
Perhaps Bitfountain is the VC firm here, you are not. Comparing apples and oranges again
- not informed on present delievery status of AM's product portfolio
Wow, get fucked. I am now informed - I don't see how this is an issue. I know WHAT AM's products are, and being a little confused about the details of the transition from the old blades to the new blades does not really impact the big picture very much.
Would you ignore another user for this confusion? Ridiculous.
Because you have spent so much time claiming to be well informed, and hardware sales make up a large proportion of the business.
- sometimes has a postcount of more than 50% per page on a speculation thread
Guess it's gonna be kinda quiet in here for you, huh? A lot of people argue with me or ask me questions directly, and I take the time to answer them, which is why I sometimes constitute so many of the posts on a single page.
I'm not arguing with you, just pointing out flaws in your logic
- starts to seed doubts on company's reliability without any proof when he runs out of arguments ignoring the fact that he's just adressing fundamental risks that every shareholder should already be aware of in the first place.
"seed doubts on company's reliability"? Where have I questioned 'reliability', exactly? Nor have I run out of arguments, I assure you. Are any of them sensible?
Investors should be aware of the fundamental risks, but it is proven time and time again in this thread that many are not.
Perhaps they are aware of the risks, but make calculated decisions on their own, without your expert advice.
- tends to get an sarcastic undertone after broad criticism and continues preaching his standpoint instead of confessing several flaws in his argumentation to allow a constructive discussion
You are right that I can get defensive, which is a flaw and something I am aware of. However, I do not believe I ignore good counterarguments like you are insinuating. Mostly I feel like I can adequately defend my thesis from criticism.
If you have an actual disorder, then I apologise for my crack cocaine comment
Anyway, cheers, hope this thread improves for you without my posts.