The motion to allow investment in CIPHERMINE bonds didn't receive enough votes for an outcome to be determined (although a clear majority of those voted went for YES it needs to break the 50% mark to be a valid result). Basically there wasn't a valid quorum.
I've put the motion up again for slightly longer this time - but if the majority of investors aren't around then obviously it'll not receive sufficient votes again. In which case at least I know not to spend time trying to find investment opportunities (suitable investments are generally not going to available at face price for too long - so leaving a motion up for weeks isn't a viable option).
I dont think the way you talk is suitable to your investors , It's much more like a Threaten. like if we dont agree with you,we will lose the suitable investments. Also To my opinion and most company and government did, If a motion of vote to reinvest cant get enough "YES" means disagree, you should not compel us to vote it again.