You typed all of this up without even answering the question, which tells me that you just plan to ignore it, hoping it will go away. You know I am right and you not denying it proves it.
I very much did answer it. Based on the betting,
I assume it was a single person (although I have no insider knowledge that would allow me to verify that) who was consistently betting more than 1% of the bankroll amount. It's just that site never promised to stop it, and that it's irrelevant for the reasons I explained.
tldr; RHavar has lied multiple times. quickmaffs has not.
It's not irrelevant at all. My problem is that you lied. My problem is that in an attempt to cover up this lie, you tried to discredit me. You are a dishonest and shameful human being.
Higher bet limits
To protect investors, the most a single player can win in one game is 1 % of the bankroll, in line with the Kelly criterion. If a player were to win more than that, he will be forced to cash out.
tldr; the max bet restriction exists to protect the experience of other players, not investors/the house
It's clear as day that these are totally different things. Thanks for proving my point.