The purpose of this thread is to publish hate-mail, whines, threats, etc. I receive for spamfighting activity, in cases where no other pertinent thread exists. If/where warranted, I may then use posts here as references for issuing negative trust feedback.
To inaugurate this thread, following is my very first hate-note specifically for spamfighting activities on this forum. (I have previously (2018-02-16) received a
PM threat from a troll who was subsequently banned.)
PM from: #1431219 quyhj94Activity: 70
Merit: 0
Posts: 124
Account (
archived) personal text: Thu Quy
Account current signature: ARCBLOCK ┃PRIVATE SALE OPEN ON 12TH -28 JANUARY ┃ARCBLOCK (
https://www. arcblock .io/)
[spaces added to prevent URL from linkifying]Prior history: Merit-beggar who spammed the forum repeatedly begging for merit. Red-tagged by me 2018-02-05, later by others. Note: #1809792 littlepony left this user two positive feedbacks on 2018-02-17, in a self-evident (futile!) attempt to counteract negative feedbacks. littlepony has an account (
archived) website field consisting of a
reflink for bountyplatform.io. I am red-tagging littlepony for trust farming; see below. I should thank quyhj94 for bringing this to my attention with its hate-PM.
Subject: Fuck you bitch !Fuck you bitch !
After I post this, I will leave additional negative trust feedback for
#1431219 quyhj94 with this post as a reference, and the following comment:
Vitriolically unrepentant merit-beggar. Repeatedly red-tagged for merit begging and spamming the forum to beg for merit; negative feedback issued by me on 2018-02-05, by Vod on 2018-02-06, and by DannyHamilton on 2018-02-20. Subsequently sent me a hate-PM:
Date: 2018-02-27 09:08:29Z
Subject: Fuck you bitch !
Text: Fuck you bitch !
Such a renegade response from one who has been caught doing wrong is demonstrative of an incorrigible and *untrustworthy* character. AVOID.
(Note: This account #1431219 was sent two transparent sham positive feedbacks on 2018-02-17 from #1809792 littlepony in a bald-faced attempt to counteract deserved and documented negative feedbacks. See reference link.)
(Also note: As of the time I post this, this account #1431219s trust page bears the notation, This user's password was reset recently. The same notation appears on #1809792s trust page. For investigative purposes *only*, I here articulate a suspicion that these users may be farmed and traded sockpuppet accounts.)
This feedback is made consistently with my trust feedback policy:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3009256.0
After I post this, I will leave negative feedback for
#1809792 littlepony with this post as a reference, and the following comment:
Trust-farming. On 2018-02-17, #1809792 littlepony left two positive trust feedbacks for #1431219 quyhj94 in a self-evident (futile!) attempt to counteract negative trust feedback which quyhj94 had received for merit-begging and spamming the forum to beg for merit.
Pertinent history (excluding a neutral feedback for quyhj94 2018-02-05 for merit-begging, and also *another* negative feedback for quyhj94 2018-02-20 for merit-begging):
nullius negative feedback to #1431219 quyhj94
Date: 2018-02-05
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20180205161858/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.msg29662555#msg29662555
Comment: Has spammed almost identical Dear my friend merit-begging posts into multiple threads (one of which is archived in reference). FOR SHAME, AND FOR SHAME AGAIN! (Note: At the time of this writing, quyhj94s trust page says, This user's password was reset recently.)
Vods negative feedback to #1431219 quyhj94
Date: 2018-02-06
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.msg29662555#msg29662555
Comment: Spamming the forum asking for merit.
#1809792 littlepony positive feedback to #1431219 quyhj94
Date: 2018-02-17
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference: (none)
Comment: Why?
#1809792 littlepony positive feedback to #1431219 quyhj94
Date: 2018-02-17
Risked BTC amount: 0.00000000
Reference: (none)
Comment: I believe him, he is good man !
(Side note that #1431219s Gender field says Female. On the Internet, who knows. Anyway, she is not good man ! )
https://web.archive.org/web/20180227092533/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1431219
(Also note: As of the time I post this, this account #1809792s trust page bears the notation, This user's password was reset recently. The same notation appears on #1431219s trust page. For investigative purposes *only*, I here articulate a suspicion that these users may be farmed and traded sockpuppet accounts.)
Leaving sham positive trust feedback for the transparent dominant purpose of attempting to counteract deserved and documented negative feedback is *untrustworthy behaviour*.
This feedback is made consistently with my trust feedback policy:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3009256.0
Whines > /dev/null. Otherwise, shall be published here.
Edited to add note about both #1809792 and #1431219 having recently reset passwords. Both negative feedbacks have been adjusted to note this; also, to cross-reference the trust farming. For investigative purposes *only*, I here articulate a suspicion that these users may be farmed and traded sockpuppet accounts.
