Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Should Bitcoin even have a future?
by
reynilynedago
on 28/02/2018, 00:03:50 UTC
Now that I've gotten your attention, I promise there's a method to my madness. We've all been arguing over Bitcoin XT and (now) Bitcoin Classic while ignoring that there's a real world outside of Bitcointalk and the endless schemes to get more Bitcoin. In the grand scheme of things, it's not even really all that important whether Bitcoin stands a chance of destroying traditional banks as long as Bitcoin or whatever replaces Bitcoin if it stumbles can carve out its own niche. But we're marching toward a world where things are going to be moving pretty fast in matters that don't necessarily have to do with economics and finances, except for maybe who's going to be holding the moneybags. Is it going to be us, or is it going to be the big banks, or is it going to be some Third World tyrant who may have gotten a little too big for his britches and doesn't have a graceful way out? What I'm getting at here is, are we absolutely sure we're making all the right strategic moves to make sure cryptocurrencies have a meaningful, sustainable future instead of just being seen as a funny little gimmick that went the way of Beanie Babies in a few decades? Should we be making alliances with other up-and-coming, innovative technologies to make sure we can achieve our long-term goals? This is something we'll have to consider if we want Bitcoin to have any kind of a future.
I guess so, currency wise, bitcoin should indeed face a good future. Not only because we investors depend on its existence to earn profits, but also because unlike any other thing, bitcoin has the most potential to revolutionize currency. And because it is global, not only it could change currencies but it could also be a way for nations to unite or a reason for a war. Either way, I still firmly believe bitcoin will have a good future and bitcoin should have a good future in the world of currency.