Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved!
And you tested 10000$ worth script using...faucet...and recommend it. 
I profited in the 10 minutes I had it running. What else would you prefer that I say?How about the fact that it was only tested for 10 minutes, you only gave it one try. You also seem familar with the gambler's fallacy, something you'd know would disprove her/his theory.
Your chance of winning does not increase at all when you hit a red streak of something. Instead it stays the same.
So based on that your method is already not working.
This is the famous gambler's fallacy. Gamblers tend to think that they are able to beat the house because after each loss their chance of winning rises. But that is mathematically not true because each event is independent of what happened before that.
So based on that your method is already not working.
This is the famous gambler's fallacy. Gamblers tend to think that they are able to beat the house because after each loss their chance of winning rises. But that is mathematically not true because each event is independent of what happened before that.
I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.
No. You claim that you are consistently able to with 10% ROI, or more. You do not mention any loss, but you do mention that "you cannot go wrong with it". The only "golden" scripts imo are the positive EV ones that worked on bustabit v1, and whatever clones of the site exist now. Even +EV scripts can and will lose, such as EDGE_NXTAE, which was a +EV script. It at one point was down 2 BTC, despite playing +EV and had no promises of guaranteed 10% ROI.