Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved!
Sorry for the excessive multi-post; but I want to make certain that aTriz sees this and it doesnt get lost in an edit:
I don't that was in the contract. Technically the contract means I have to buy her sig for 3 years, correct?
I think this is the point where you look into terms such as an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, fundamental to all contracts, as well as the various types of potential fraud in the inception of a contract. I could say much more about these matters; but this is neither the time nor the place.
Edit to add: Contracts are never to be applied mechanistically. One of the problems and challenges with smart contracts goes beyond obtaining formally verifiable contracts à la the Bitcoin Simplicity research: Designing a contract which can be applied mechanistically is much different in concept than designing a contract between human beings.
Do you get your money back if she gets negative trust?
Nope I don't that was in the contract. Technically the contract means I have to buy her sig for 3 years, correct? I think this is the point where you look into terms such as an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, fundamental to all contracts, as well as the various types of potential fraud in the inception of a contract. I could say much more about these matters; but this is neither the time nor the place.
Edit to add: Contracts are never to be applied mechanistically. One of the problems and challenges with smart contracts goes beyond obtaining formally verifiable contracts à la the Bitcoin Simplicity research: Designing a contract which can be applied mechanistically is much different in concept than designing a contract between human beings.