Fake investors: nullius is fake? SyGambler is fake? TelevisionLover is gake? I added my brother there to gain credibility, which may have been wrong of me, but to be fair, I do gamble for him a lot, and the amount has been larger than 2 BTC.
The investors in question are not persons who gambled with you while the thread was open, but rather, the investors for whom you shut the thread down. After which you told me that if I wanted back in on the game, minimum investment was 1.2 BTC. Oops, I forgot to mention that before.
Could you brought a substantial return on 1.2 BTC for me? Too bad, Ill never know...
(I have a few other potential replies upthread; but I wanted to address that quickly.)
The minimum investment
has had been set in place in order to give me a better reward for the time I put in. Although, I am no longer accepting new investors anymore, and am stopping the service on this forum entirely.
I want to understand this: Other than the simple business consideration of keeping your customer base small and thus manageable, what difference would it make to take, say, 1.2 BTC from whale_of_a_bettor plus 0.02 BTC from me, and gamble 1.22 BTC with proceeds split appropriately?
If I understand nullius's point correctly,he wants to know who are the investors you found on the forum who invested 1.2 BTC in that service ? Since you said you have found investors and are not accepting participants anymore,you should have some sort of proof right ?
Actually, no: My point is to inquire as to whether doubling 0.01 BTC for me was an investment on conning a rich mark.
In her very first PM to me, Alia said that I must be rich. I never contradicted this; I let her make her own assumptions. Only after she required 1.2 BTC from me upfront for a deal I had
seen to be profitable, I regrettably had to inform her that I do not have that kind of money to invest. I really dont.
My PM inbox got a bit quieter after that...