I gave it to you because I made money off your money, and was rewarding you for it.
Can you share (links to) the actual bets where you turned 0.01 BTC into (more than) 0.02 BTC at the time you were in possession of nullius' money?
Thats possible? (See how much I know about gambling websites...)
Depending on the site it can either be links to bets, a list of Bet IDs, or even a graph. I'm sure alia knows how to do this, proven
here.
Archived:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180228075530/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2936044.msg30806393#msg30806393Per my standard procedure, I requested that all info (addresses, amounts, etc.) be handled with PGP encryption. I want at least one tiny shred of blockchain privacy. However, I think after this, I will need to thoroughly anonymize this coin anyway. (And if you wonder where it came from:
Thorough anonymization. Knock yourself out looking.)
txid for 0.01101346 BTC sent nullius → alia:
554962af97ea469ade363e4f6e402de37e9270a242e81b45c5dfa7b21e8fcc0b
txid for 0.021 BTC (exactly) received alia → nullius:
44e3aeed8ba068f52e048d76776205bcee05902af7db1eecbd697e7ac819c1ec
(Edit: Yes, as you will note, she allegedly gambled and then sent 0.021 BTC while my 0.01101346 BTC was still unconfirmed. Either Im trustworthy for not committing a double-spend attack on 0.01101346 BTC, or the amounts were unimportant for serving the objective, or both.)
I am curious if she is even able to produce txid's for the transactions with nullic.
Slip of the tongue, there?
I was already gathering the txids on presumption that LoyceV (
et alia) would want them, plus the archive on presumption thatits wise policy.
(Edit: For those not up on Latin puns,
et al. (the familiar abbreviation) stands for
et alia (and others).)