Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved!
You made a contradictory mistake.
A self-fulfilling prophecy. OP continues with what was the actual intent behind this thread.[1]Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.
I therefore ask a DT (not Lauda or the others from the "entourage") to watch aTriz, because what is going on there is very fishy. I believe that both are involved in this scam.
Your whole thread setup was exactly that, negative of both aTriz and me who are not related to Alia. I think after hundreds of these attacks, I developed a new sense for them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯I tried to find your post about it, but couldn't.
It was "in the contract" specifically that red trust wouldn't affect payments?? Wow. Were you pissed up when you agreed to that?
I wouldn't pay the lying con artist a sat; what's she/he/it going to do, sue you?
But now you've accepted that the account is wrecked, you'll want to do something about this rather bizarre sight, guilt by association and all that..
This is what I dislike about long term contracts. The one between them was somewhat vague in the sense that it doesn't cover a lot of possible scenarios. My reasonable assumption was that either one could quit as long as the current month was paid for (or advertised for); however, not even that is properly covered in their thread. However, the negative ratings make the circumstances out-of-the-ordinary and I assume that aTriz can safely exit the contract.It was "in the contract" specifically that red trust wouldn't affect payments?? Wow. Were you pissed up when you agreed to that?
I wouldn't pay the lying con artist a sat; what's she/he/it going to do, sue you?
But now you've accepted that the account is wrecked, you'll want to do something about this rather bizarre sight, guilt by association and all that..
[1]
