Of course you can. The girls above did. People can just use their wife/girlfriend/sister/slam-piece/girl they met off tinder etc etc. A picture/call/webcam session proves little really. All it proves is there's a woman involved somewhere whether voluntary or involuntary. The Speaker girl above was in on most of it but it was a guy controlling 'her' forum account here orchestrating the scams and as far as I recall the homeless Jackie girl was apparently just sneakily exploited without her knowledge of the scam, and again, the same dude was pulling the strings here without her knowledge.


To scam, obviously. You know as much as I do if you can convince people you're a woman beyond all reasonable doubt it will be a lot easier for you to scam. I would bet both my bollocks you are almost certainty a dude in charge of this account just to try scam in any capacity you can (and looking at your threads these methods seem to be quite diverse), but sure, there likely will be real life woman you've managed to convince to do cam sessions or whatnot involved but it proves nothing.


Make it a better place by attempting tax evasion and other shenanigans? Forget it. Move on to the next account/scam/girl. The it was my brother/mother/sister/class mate and we were just sharing accounts is the bitcointalk equivalent of the dog ate my homework excuse.


Not yet. The long con game was obviously in motion though.


Your rep won't be restored or story believed even if you did a dance on cam for me that I specifically choreographed for you with your passport and social security card glued to your forehead whilst chanting my username and today's date. You're just wasting your time here now.